Skip to Content
Main content

PS 144 COL JEROMUS REMSEN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

67

18%

LEVEL 3

99

27%

LEVEL 4

161

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

47

14%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

190

55%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

32

19%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

74

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

21

12%

LEVEL 3

45

25%

LEVEL 4

96

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

87

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

26

15%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

94

56%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

22

71%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

28
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

23

72%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

112
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

12

9%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

78

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

106
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

85

71%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

88
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

45

35%

LEVEL 4

43

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

36

29%

LEVEL 4

62

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

15

24%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

16

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

20

31%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

17

26%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

55

17%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

155

48%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

33

11%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

183

60%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

16

41%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

18

43%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

258
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

64

18%

LEVEL 3

98

28%

LEVEL 4

160

45%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

257
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

44

13%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

186

55%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

210
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

46

17%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

133

48%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

213
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

32

12%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

159

59%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

18

20%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

22

25%

LEVEL 4

28

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

21

26%

LEVEL 4

31

39%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

257
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

65

18%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

160

45%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

260
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

45

13%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

189

56%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.