Skip to Content
Main content

PS 124 OSMOND A CHURCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 751

LEVEL 1

211

28%

LEVEL 2

233

31%

LEVEL 3

174

23%

LEVEL 4

133

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 745

LEVEL 1

195

26%

LEVEL 2

212

28%

LEVEL 3

184

25%

LEVEL 4

154

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

100

28%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

80

23%

LEVEL 4

57

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

89

25%

LEVEL 2

109

31%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

59

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

170
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

111

28%

LEVEL 2

116

29%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

76

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

183
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

106

27%

LEVEL 2

103

26%

LEVEL 3

88

22%

LEVEL 4

95

24%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

21
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

11

27%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

17

41%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

25
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

19

43%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

194
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

83

22%

LEVEL 2

107

28%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

96

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

193
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

68

18%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

87

23%

LEVEL 4

106

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

55

35%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

65

44%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

57

38%

LEVEL 2

57

38%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

47

30%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

300
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 677

LEVEL 1

167

25%

LEVEL 2

210

31%

LEVEL 3

171

25%

LEVEL 4

129

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

327
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 667

LEVEL 1

150

22%

LEVEL 2

190

28%

LEVEL 3

176

26%

LEVEL 4

151

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

44

59%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

45

58%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

301
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 710

LEVEL 1

193

27%

LEVEL 2

216

30%

LEVEL 3

168

24%

LEVEL 4

133

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

329
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 708

LEVEL 1

176

25%

LEVEL 2

203

29%

LEVEL 3

177

25%

LEVEL 4

152

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

18

44%

LEVEL 2

17

41%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

19

51%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

72

26%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

60

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

63

21%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

61

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

139

29%

LEVEL 2

152

32%

LEVEL 3

108

23%

LEVEL 4

73

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

132

29%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

108

24%

LEVEL 4

93

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

299
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

208

28%

LEVEL 2

229

31%

LEVEL 3

169

23%

LEVEL 4

130

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

332
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 729

LEVEL 1

186

26%

LEVEL 2

211

29%

LEVEL 3

179

25%

LEVEL 4

153

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.