Skip to Content
Main content

PS 203 OAKLAND GARDENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

418
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

27

6%

LEVEL 3

91

20%

LEVEL 4

327

71%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

390
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

23

5%

LEVEL 3

68

16%

LEVEL 4

322

76%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

187
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

16

8%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

143

68%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

186
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

12

6%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

150

75%

MALE

PROFICIENT

231
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

11

4%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

184

74%

MALE

PROFICIENT

204
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

172

78%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

6

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

334
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

11

3%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

271

78%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

311
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

8

2%

LEVEL 3

47

15%

LEVEL 4

264

82%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

36

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

31

61%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

12

39%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

19

59%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

393
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

16

4%

LEVEL 3

79

19%

LEVEL 4

314

76%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

374
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

11

3%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

313

81%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

13

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

387
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

22

5%

LEVEL 3

74

18%

LEVEL 4

313

75%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

359
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

21

5%

LEVEL 3

54

14%

LEVEL 4

305

79%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

31
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

17

43%

LEVEL 4

14

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

31
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

14

38%

LEVEL 4

17

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

10

4%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

193

80%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

221
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

12

5%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

191

81%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

191
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

17

8%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

134

62%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

169
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

11

6%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

131

71%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.