Skip to Content
Main content

PS 20 JOHN BOWNE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

61

11%

LEVEL 2

117

21%

LEVEL 3

159

28%

LEVEL 4

230

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

347
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

70

14%

LEVEL 2

92

18%

LEVEL 3

141

28%

LEVEL 4

206

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

178
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

60

23%

LEVEL 3

69

26%

LEVEL 4

109

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

40

17%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

88

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

211
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

57

19%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

121

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

189
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

52

19%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

118

42%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

344
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

79

18%

LEVEL 3

134

30%

LEVEL 4

210

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

292
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

55

15%

LEVEL 3

108

30%

LEVEL 4

184

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

13

54%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

28

32%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

34

34%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

375
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

87

18%

LEVEL 3

149

30%

LEVEL 4

226

46%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

330
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

37

8%

LEVEL 2

71

16%

LEVEL 3

130

30%

LEVEL 4

200

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

33

43%

LEVEL 2

30

39%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

33

46%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

314
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

71

17%

LEVEL 3

112

26%

LEVEL 4

202

48%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

284
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

59

15%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

177

46%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

23

16%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

29

23%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

29

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

12

40%

LEVEL 4

10

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

8

16%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

26

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

367
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

58

11%

LEVEL 2

112

21%

LEVEL 3

147

27%

LEVEL 4

220

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

313
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

62

14%

LEVEL 2

83

18%

LEVEL 3

133

29%

LEVEL 4

180

39%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

366
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

53

10%

LEVEL 2

112

21%

LEVEL 3

145

27%

LEVEL 4

221

42%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

330
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

65

13%

LEVEL 2

88

18%

LEVEL 3

131

27%

LEVEL 4

199

41%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

14

39%

LEVEL 4

9

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

7

27%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.