PS 229 EMANUEL KAPLAN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

385
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 660

LEVEL 1

110

17%

LEVEL 2

165

25%

LEVEL 3

167

25%

LEVEL 4

218

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

432
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 685

LEVEL 1

112

16%

LEVEL 2

141

21%

LEVEL 3

194

28%

LEVEL 4

238

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

116

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

210
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

78

23%

LEVEL 3

91

27%

LEVEL 4

119

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

204
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

74

22%

LEVEL 3

102

30%

LEVEL 4

102

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

222
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

63

18%

LEVEL 2

63

18%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

119

34%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

199
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

32

13%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

128

52%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

202
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

33

13%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

142

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

37

27%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

53

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

29

20%

LEVEL 3

44

31%

LEVEL 4

54

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

96
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

77

29%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

126
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

80

29%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

348
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

124

24%

LEVEL 3

138

27%

LEVEL 4

210

41%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

393
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

51

9%

LEVEL 2

106

19%

LEVEL 3

167

30%

LEVEL 4

226

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

37
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

66

46%

LEVEL 2

41

28%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

39
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

61

45%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

27

20%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

371
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

82

14%

LEVEL 2

140

24%

LEVEL 3

157

26%

LEVEL 4

214

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

421
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 624

LEVEL 1

80

13%

LEVEL 2

123

20%

LEVEL 3

184

29%

LEVEL 4

237

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

28

42%

LEVEL 2

25

37%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

32

52%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

36

18%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

94

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

34

17%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

95

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

235
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

93

20%

LEVEL 2

129

28%

LEVEL 3

111

24%

LEVEL 4

124

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

285
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

89

19%

LEVEL 2

107

22%

LEVEL 3

142

30%

LEVEL 4

143

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

371
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

100

16%

LEVEL 2

157

25%

LEVEL 3

158

25%

LEVEL 4

213

34%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

421
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

96

15%

LEVEL 2

124

19%

LEVEL 3

187

29%

LEVEL 4

234

37%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

10

31%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

17

39%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.