PS 19 MARINO JEANTET GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

352
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 944

LEVEL 1

299

32%

LEVEL 2

293

31%

LEVEL 3

237

25%

LEVEL 4

115

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

349
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 932

LEVEL 1

265

28%

LEVEL 2

318

34%

LEVEL 3

220

24%

LEVEL 4

129

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

147

32%

LEVEL 2

144

31%

LEVEL 3

118

25%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

138

29%

LEVEL 2

166

35%

LEVEL 3

106

23%

LEVEL 4

58

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

178
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

152

32%

LEVEL 2

149

31%

LEVEL 3

119

25%

LEVEL 4

59

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

185
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

127

27%

LEVEL 2

152

33%

LEVEL 3

114

25%

LEVEL 4

71

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

20

31%

LEVEL 4

19

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

19

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

308
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 868

LEVEL 1

286

33%

LEVEL 2

274

32%

LEVEL 3

214

25%

LEVEL 4

94

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

312
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 870

LEVEL 1

255

29%

LEVEL 2

303

35%

LEVEL 3

206

24%

LEVEL 4

106

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

320
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 733

LEVEL 1

175

24%

LEVEL 2

238

32%

LEVEL 3

211

29%

LEVEL 4

109

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

319
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 722

LEVEL 1

154

21%

LEVEL 2

249

34%

LEVEL 3

198

27%

LEVEL 4

121

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

124

59%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

111

53%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

256
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

64

14%

LEVEL 2

124

28%

LEVEL 3

158

36%

LEVEL 4

98

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

264
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

61

13%

LEVEL 2

141

30%

LEVEL 3

144

31%

LEVEL 4

120

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

96
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

235

47%

LEVEL 2

169

34%

LEVEL 3

79

16%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

85
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

204

44%

LEVEL 2

177

38%

LEVEL 3

76

16%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

21

25%

LEVEL 2

22

26%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

16

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

31

31%

LEVEL 2

26

26%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

17

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

311
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 860

LEVEL 1

278

32%

LEVEL 2

271

32%

LEVEL 3

212

25%

LEVEL 4

99

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

305
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 831

LEVEL 1

234

28%

LEVEL 2

292

35%

LEVEL 3

193

23%

LEVEL 4

112

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

319
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 807

LEVEL 1

242

30%

LEVEL 2

246

30%

LEVEL 3

216

27%

LEVEL 4

103

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

314
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 814

LEVEL 1

228

28%

LEVEL 2

272

33%

LEVEL 3

196

24%

LEVEL 4

118

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

57

42%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

35
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

37

31%

LEVEL 2

46

39%

LEVEL 3

24

20%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.