Skip to Content
Main content

PS 254 DAG HAMMARSKJOLD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

70

19%

LEVEL 3

98

27%

LEVEL 4

175

48%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

289
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

49

14%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

202

57%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

33

18%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

88

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

27

16%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

94

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

138
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

37

20%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

87

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

156
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

22

12%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

108

57%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

87
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

68

65%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

96
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

12

11%

LEVEL 3

24

22%

LEVEL 4

72

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

103

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

176
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

25

12%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

121

58%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

53

17%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

164

53%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

39

13%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

185

60%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

16

28%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

17

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

247
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

46

15%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

163

53%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

258
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

32

11%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

191

65%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

26
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

12

19%

LEVEL 2

24

39%

LEVEL 3

14

23%

LEVEL 4

12

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

31
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

13

21%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

20

33%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

22

14%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

85

56%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

17

11%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

104

68%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

90

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

32

16%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

98

49%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

271
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

68

19%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

174

48%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.