Skip to Content
Main content

PS 222 KATHERINE R SNYDER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

336
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

79

18%

LEVEL 3

126

28%

LEVEL 4

210

47%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

353
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

71

16%

LEVEL 3

117

26%

LEVEL 4

236

53%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

37

17%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

104

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

176
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

39

17%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

117

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

172
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

42

19%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

106

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

177
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

32

14%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

119

54%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

79
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

11

12%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

61

65%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

81
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

24

26%

LEVEL 4

57

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

170
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

64

31%

LEVEL 4

106

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

30

14%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

121

58%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

9

15%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

20

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

40
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

23

39%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

19

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

30

41%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

54

15%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

188

53%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

42

12%

LEVEL 3

90

25%

LEVEL 4

217

60%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

46
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

22

24%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

24

26%

LEVEL 4

22

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

46
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

14

16%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

327
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

63

15%

LEVEL 3

122

30%

LEVEL 4

205

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

338
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

59

14%

LEVEL 3

109

26%

LEVEL 4

229

56%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

16

47%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

10

27%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

119

59%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

22

10%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

137

63%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

91

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

49

21%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

99

42%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.