SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

156

41%

LEVEL 2

119

32%

LEVEL 3

67

18%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

93

29%

LEVEL 2

109

34%

LEVEL 3

84

27%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

78

43%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

78

40%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

9

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

58
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

103

43%

LEVEL 2

81

33%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

65
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

62

31%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

40

41%

LEVEL 2

31

32%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

21

26%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

92

32%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

57

22%

LEVEL 2

96

38%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

64

74%

LEVEL 2

13

15%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

36

60%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

93
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

102

34%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

107
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

59

23%

LEVEL 2

93

36%

LEVEL 3

80

31%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

54

73%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

34

60%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

26

33%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

16

20%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

24

30%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

130

44%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

77

32%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

87
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

140

43%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

104
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

81

29%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

16

33%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

15

41%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.