Skip to Content
Main content

PS 194 RAOUL WALLENBERG GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

103

40%

LEVEL 2

65

25%

LEVEL 3

57

22%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

82

33%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

56

41%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

47

36%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

47

39%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

35

30%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

17

49%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

15

35%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

12

28%

LEVEL 4

11

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

12

30%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

57

46%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

44

37%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

23

45%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

20

38%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

63

33%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

40

58%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

48

60%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

82
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

88

39%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

87
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

63

30%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

15

45%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

19

54%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

11

35%

LEVEL 4

9

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

99

44%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

77

35%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

86
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

86

38%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

87
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

17

55%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

14

45%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.