Skip to Content
Main content

PS 197 KINGS HIGHWAY ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

64

22%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

103

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

57

17%

LEVEL 2

67

20%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

131

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

59

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

28

16%

LEVEL 2

37

21%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

65

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

44

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

30

19%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

66

41%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

10

25%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

12

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

16

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

37

21%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

72

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

87

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

10

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

6

20%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

16

53%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

9

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

45

19%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

100

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

47

17%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

124

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

21

40%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

21

38%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

144
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

34

17%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

96

48%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

176
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

38

16%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

118

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

30
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

26

30%

LEVEL 2

30

35%

LEVEL 3

23

27%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

37
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

35

35%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

17

19%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

38

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

12

10%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

69

59%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

65

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

62

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

165
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

52

21%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

97

38%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

193
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

55

19%

LEVEL 3

72

25%

LEVEL 4

121

42%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.