Skip to Content
Main content

PS 253 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

350
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

19

4%

LEVEL 2

56

13%

LEVEL 3

118

28%

LEVEL 4

232

55%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

402
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

28

6%

LEVEL 3

120

27%

LEVEL 4

282

64%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

176
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

24

11%

LEVEL 3

62

29%

LEVEL 4

114

54%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

191
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

131

64%

MALE

PROFICIENT

174
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

118

55%

MALE

PROFICIENT

211
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

151

65%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

138
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

13

8%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

104

66%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

156
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

120

71%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

67

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

90

77%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

105
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

48

34%

LEVEL 4

57

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

124
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

16

11%

LEVEL 3

59

42%

LEVEL 4

65

46%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

43

12%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

209

58%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

353
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

22

6%

LEVEL 3

96

25%

LEVEL 4

257

68%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

45
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

22

34%

LEVEL 4

23

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

49
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

24

41%

LEVEL 4

25

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

303
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

41

12%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

206

58%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

341
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

16

4%

LEVEL 3

93

26%

LEVEL 4

248

69%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

47
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

26

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

61
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

27

35%

LEVEL 4

34

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

22

32%

LEVEL 4

39

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

52

69%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

289
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

49

14%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

193

54%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

333
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

23

6%

LEVEL 3

103

28%

LEVEL 4

230

63%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

336
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

53

13%

LEVEL 3

113

28%

LEVEL 4

223

55%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

386
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

28

7%

LEVEL 3

110

26%

LEVEL 4

276

65%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

9

50%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

10

63%

LEVEL 4

6

38%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.