JHS 201 DYKER HEIGHTS (THE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,108
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,544

LEVEL 1

147

10%

LEVEL 2

289

19%

LEVEL 3

376

24%

LEVEL 4

732

47%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,211
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,580

LEVEL 1

137

9%

LEVEL 2

232

15%

LEVEL 3

353

22%

LEVEL 4

858

54%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

501
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 697

LEVEL 1

63

9%

LEVEL 2

133

19%

LEVEL 3

167

24%

LEVEL 4

334

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

554
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 725

LEVEL 1

63

9%

LEVEL 2

108

15%

LEVEL 3

150

21%

LEVEL 4

404

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

607
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 847

LEVEL 1

84

10%

LEVEL 2

156

18%

LEVEL 3

209

25%

LEVEL 4

398

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

657
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 855

LEVEL 1

74

9%

LEVEL 2

124

15%

LEVEL 3

203

24%

LEVEL 4

454

53%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

708
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 823

LEVEL 1

30

4%

LEVEL 2

85

10%

LEVEL 3

171

21%

LEVEL 4

537

65%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

788
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 890

LEVEL 1

30

3%

LEVEL 2

72

8%

LEVEL 3

163

18%

LEVEL 4

625

70%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

295
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

57

12%

LEVEL 2

117

25%

LEVEL 3

145

31%

LEVEL 4

150

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

303
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

91

21%

LEVEL 3

127

29%

LEVEL 4

176

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

96
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

113
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

54

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,055
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,339

LEVEL 1

72

5%

LEVEL 2

212

16%

LEVEL 3

346

26%

LEVEL 4

709

53%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,143
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,392

LEVEL 1

67

5%

LEVEL 2

182

13%

LEVEL 3

309

22%

LEVEL 4

834

60%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

75

37%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

68
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

70

37%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,062
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,390

LEVEL 1

95

7%

LEVEL 2

233

17%

LEVEL 3

345

25%

LEVEL 4

717

52%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,156
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,419

LEVEL 1

80

6%

LEVEL 2

183

13%

LEVEL 3

318

22%

LEVEL 4

838

59%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

46
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

52

34%

LEVEL 2

56

36%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

55
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

57

35%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

308
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

40

11%

LEVEL 3

105

28%

LEVEL 4

203

55%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

348
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

46

11%

LEVEL 3

95

23%

LEVEL 4

253

61%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

800
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,173

LEVEL 1

124

11%

LEVEL 2

249

21%

LEVEL 3

271

23%

LEVEL 4

529

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

863
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,166

LEVEL 1

117

10%

LEVEL 2

186

16%

LEVEL 3

258

22%

LEVEL 4

605

52%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1,075
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,491

LEVEL 1

140

9%

LEVEL 2

276

19%

LEVEL 3

365

24%

LEVEL 4

710

48%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1,191
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,551

LEVEL 1

129

8%

LEVEL 2

231

15%

LEVEL 3

345

22%

LEVEL 4

846

55%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

22

42%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

8

28%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

12

41%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.