JHS 223 MONTAUK (THE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

521
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 876

LEVEL 1

131

15%

LEVEL 2

224

26%

LEVEL 3

245

28%

LEVEL 4

276

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

535
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 868

LEVEL 1

125

14%

LEVEL 2

208

24%

LEVEL 3

225

26%

LEVEL 4

310

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

253
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

63

15%

LEVEL 2

103

25%

LEVEL 3

116

28%

LEVEL 4

137

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

252
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

64

15%

LEVEL 2

106

25%

LEVEL 3

89

21%

LEVEL 4

163

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

268
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

68

15%

LEVEL 2

121

26%

LEVEL 3

129

28%

LEVEL 4

139

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

283
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

61

14%

LEVEL 2

102

23%

LEVEL 3

136

30%

LEVEL 4

147

33%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

404
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

46

8%

LEVEL 2

118

21%

LEVEL 3

167

29%

LEVEL 4

237

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

384
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

37

7%

LEVEL 2

105

20%

LEVEL 3

131

25%

LEVEL 4

253

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

15

18%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

24

29%

LEVEL 4

14

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

36

34%

LEVEL 3

30

29%

LEVEL 4

26

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

67

32%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

70

32%

LEVEL 2

66

30%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

509
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 798

LEVEL 1

89

11%

LEVEL 2

200

25%

LEVEL 3

234

29%

LEVEL 4

275

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

521
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 787

LEVEL 1

86

11%

LEVEL 2

180

23%

LEVEL 3

216

27%

LEVEL 4

305

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

42

54%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

39

48%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

413
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

45

8%

LEVEL 2

134

23%

LEVEL 3

172

29%

LEVEL 4

241

41%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

460
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

39

6%

LEVEL 2

131

21%

LEVEL 3

181

29%

LEVEL 4

279

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

108
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

86

30%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

75
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

86

36%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

10

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

12

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

507
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 856

LEVEL 1

130

15%

LEVEL 2

219

26%

LEVEL 3

241

28%

LEVEL 4

266

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

515
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 840

LEVEL 1

124

15%

LEVEL 2

201

24%

LEVEL 3

217

26%

LEVEL 4

298

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

511
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 841

LEVEL 1

122

15%

LEVEL 2

208

25%

LEVEL 3

240

29%

LEVEL 4

271

32%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

515
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 828

LEVEL 1

113

14%

LEVEL 2

200

24%

LEVEL 3

215

26%

LEVEL 4

300

36%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

16

46%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

12

30%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

10

25%

LEVEL 4

10

25%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.