JHS 292 MARGARET S DOUGLAS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

229

46%

LEVEL 2

123

25%

LEVEL 3

72

14%

LEVEL 4

78

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

219

42%

LEVEL 2

138

26%

LEVEL 3

95

18%

LEVEL 4

69

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

97

40%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

89

36%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

132

51%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

22

8%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

130

47%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

55
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

21

22%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

41

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

55
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

19

23%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

21

26%

LEVEL 4

34

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

56
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

119

50%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

62
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

117

45%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

76

52%

LEVEL 2

36

25%

LEVEL 3

17

12%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

69

45%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

144

38%

LEVEL 2

94

24%

LEVEL 3

69

18%

LEVEL 4

77

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

142

35%

LEVEL 2

110

27%

LEVEL 3

87

21%

LEVEL 4

68

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

85

72%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

77

68%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

145
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

173

41%

LEVEL 2

107

25%

LEVEL 3

68

16%

LEVEL 4

77

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

156
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

166

38%

LEVEL 2

120

27%

LEVEL 3

90

20%

LEVEL 4

66

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

56

73%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

53

67%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

13

37%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

216

46%

LEVEL 2

116

25%

LEVEL 3

66

14%

LEVEL 4

69

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

206

42%

LEVEL 2

130

27%

LEVEL 3

90

18%

LEVEL 4

63

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

133
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

169

42%

LEVEL 2

96

24%

LEVEL 3

60

15%

LEVEL 4

73

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

133
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

163

40%

LEVEL 2

111

27%

LEVEL 3

73

18%

LEVEL 4

60

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

60

58%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

56

49%

LEVEL 2

27

24%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.