JHS 218 JAMES P SINNOTT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

285

68%

LEVEL 2

80

19%

LEVEL 3

35

8%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

294

76%

LEVEL 2

69

18%

LEVEL 3

23

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

129

66%

LEVEL 2

40

20%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

135

73%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

13

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

156

69%

LEVEL 2

40

18%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

11
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

159

78%

LEVEL 2

33

16%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

42

53%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

12

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

50

71%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

101

67%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

119

77%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

134

77%

LEVEL 2

28

16%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

117

79%

LEVEL 2

23

16%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

193

60%

LEVEL 2

73

23%

LEVEL 3

35

11%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

200

69%

LEVEL 2

64

22%

LEVEL 3

22

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

92

93%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

94

94%

LEVEL 2

5

5%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

50
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

194

63%

LEVEL 2

66

21%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

24
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

197

71%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

22

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

91

82%

LEVEL 2

14

13%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

97

87%

LEVEL 2

13

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

15

68%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

270

68%

LEVEL 2

77

19%

LEVEL 3

33

8%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

286

76%

LEVEL 2

69

18%

LEVEL 3

20

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

51
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

222

64%

LEVEL 2

72

21%

LEVEL 3

31

9%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

236

75%

LEVEL 2

57

18%

LEVEL 3

21

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

63

83%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

58

81%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.