IS 285 MEYER LEVIN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

276

47%

LEVEL 2

196

33%

LEVEL 3

102

17%

LEVEL 4

18

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

248

38%

LEVEL 2

215

33%

LEVEL 3

131

20%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

155

47%

LEVEL 2

111

34%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

135

36%

LEVEL 2

120

32%

LEVEL 3

82

22%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

121

46%

LEVEL 2

85

33%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

113

41%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

107
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

259

47%

LEVEL 2

186

34%

LEVEL 3

90

16%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

168
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

237

39%

LEVEL 2

198

33%

LEVEL 3

120

20%

LEVEL 4

48

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

214

42%

LEVEL 2

183

36%

LEVEL 3

99

19%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

188

34%

LEVEL 2

194

35%

LEVEL 3

122

22%

LEVEL 4

52

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

62

79%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

60

66%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

119
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

260

46%

LEVEL 2

192

34%

LEVEL 3

101

18%

LEVEL 4

18

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

180
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

239

38%

LEVEL 2

208

33%

LEVEL 3

128

20%

LEVEL 4

52

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

16

76%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

54

41%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

48

31%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

222

48%

LEVEL 2

149

32%

LEVEL 3

78

17%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

200

41%

LEVEL 2

162

33%

LEVEL 3

97

20%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

106
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

237

45%

LEVEL 2

180

34%

LEVEL 3

90

17%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

169
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

214

38%

LEVEL 2

181

32%

LEVEL 3

121

21%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

39

57%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

34

41%

LEVEL 2

34

41%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.