PS 235 JANICE MARIE KNIGHT SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

484
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 743

LEVEL 1

110

15%

LEVEL 2

149

20%

LEVEL 3

224

30%

LEVEL 4

260

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

440
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

89

13%

LEVEL 2

134

20%

LEVEL 3

208

31%

LEVEL 4

232

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

274
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

56

14%

LEVEL 2

77

19%

LEVEL 3

123

30%

LEVEL 4

151

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

255
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

86

23%

LEVEL 3

121

32%

LEVEL 4

134

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

210
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

72

21%

LEVEL 3

101

30%

LEVEL 4

109

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

185
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

48

17%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

98

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

447
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 684

LEVEL 1

98

14%

LEVEL 2

139

20%

LEVEL 3

211

31%

LEVEL 4

236

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

405
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

79

13%

LEVEL 2

126

21%

LEVEL 3

195

32%

LEVEL 4

210

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

9

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

482
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 703

LEVEL 1

78

11%

LEVEL 2

143

20%

LEVEL 3

222

32%

LEVEL 4

260

37%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

434
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 615

LEVEL 1

55

9%

LEVEL 2

126

20%

LEVEL 3

204

33%

LEVEL 4

230

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

32

80%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

34

71%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

484
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 731

LEVEL 1

101

14%

LEVEL 2

146

20%

LEVEL 3

224

31%

LEVEL 4

260

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

438
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

86

13%

LEVEL 2

131

20%

LEVEL 3

206

31%

LEVEL 4

232

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

165
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

28

13%

LEVEL 3

71

34%

LEVEL 4

94

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

30

13%

LEVEL 3

79

34%

LEVEL 4

100

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

319
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

95

18%

LEVEL 2

121

23%

LEVEL 3

153

29%

LEVEL 4

166

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

261
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

68

16%

LEVEL 2

104

24%

LEVEL 3

129

30%

LEVEL 4

132

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

472
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 713

LEVEL 1

100

14%

LEVEL 2

141

20%

LEVEL 3

220

31%

LEVEL 4

252

35%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

432
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 649

LEVEL 1

87

13%

LEVEL 2

130

20%

LEVEL 3

202

31%

LEVEL 4

230

35%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

8

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.