Skip to Content
Main content

PS 249 CATON (THE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

74

20%

LEVEL 3

93

26%

LEVEL 4

168

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

70

19%

LEVEL 3

116

31%

LEVEL 4

166

44%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

36

20%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

81

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

73

38%

LEVEL 4

77

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

87

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

89

49%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

21

88%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

16

80%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

91
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

55

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

102
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

57

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

134
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

39

21%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

84

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

145
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

30

16%

LEVEL 3

62

34%

LEVEL 4

83

45%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

51

17%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

157

52%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

46

15%

LEVEL 3

101

33%

LEVEL 4

151

49%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

14

22%

LEVEL 2

23

36%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

15

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

226
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

56

18%

LEVEL 3

76

25%

LEVEL 4

150

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

254
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

57

17%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

161

49%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

35
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

18

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

28
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

23

49%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

42

54%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

45

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

63

22%

LEVEL 3

75

26%

LEVEL 4

126

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

210
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

52

19%

LEVEL 3

89

32%

LEVEL 4

121

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

236
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

64

20%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

155

48%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

255
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

64

19%

LEVEL 3

105

31%

LEVEL 4

150

45%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

13

31%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

27
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

16

41%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.