Skip to Content
Main content

PS 58 CARROLL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

313
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

65

16%

LEVEL 3

131

33%

LEVEL 4

182

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

332
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

73

17%

LEVEL 3

156

37%

LEVEL 4

176

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

27

14%

LEVEL 3

66

34%

LEVEL 4

87

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

40

19%

LEVEL 3

89

42%

LEVEL 4

76

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

38

18%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

95

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

33

16%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

100

48%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

27
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

11

30%

LEVEL 4

16

43%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

34
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

21

49%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

8

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

235
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

49

17%

LEVEL 3

95

32%

LEVEL 4

140

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

260
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

47

15%

LEVEL 3

124

39%

LEVEL 4

136

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

8

18%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

15

34%

LEVEL 4

14

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

12

28%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

42

12%

LEVEL 3

122

35%

LEVEL 4

175

50%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

54

15%

LEVEL 3

145

39%

LEVEL 4

165

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

23

45%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

11

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

298
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

57

15%

LEVEL 3

120

32%

LEVEL 4

178

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

319
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

70

17%

LEVEL 3

147

37%

LEVEL 4

172

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

9

50%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

294
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

53

15%

LEVEL 3

119

33%

LEVEL 4

175

49%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

303
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

56

15%

LEVEL 3

140

38%

LEVEL 4

163

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

16

30%

LEVEL 4

13

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.