IS 136 CHARLES O DEWEY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

284

63%

LEVEL 2

101

22%

LEVEL 3

46

10%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

291

59%

LEVEL 2

134

27%

LEVEL 3

57

12%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

150

65%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

158

61%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

134

61%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

133

56%

LEVEL 2

61

26%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

13

35%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

12

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

18

40%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

21

60%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

15

83%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

244

67%

LEVEL 2

78

21%

LEVEL 3

35

10%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

252

63%

LEVEL 2

112

28%

LEVEL 3

32

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

216

59%

LEVEL 2

88

24%

LEVEL 3

43

12%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

213

54%

LEVEL 2

116

29%

LEVEL 3

55

14%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

68

81%

LEVEL 2

13

15%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

78

79%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

55
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

143

53%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

55
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

152

50%

LEVEL 2

99

32%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

141

79%

LEVEL 2

28

16%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

139

74%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

24

62%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

274

63%

LEVEL 2

100

23%

LEVEL 3

45

10%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

267

59%

LEVEL 2

127

28%

LEVEL 3

52

11%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

61
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

264

63%

LEVEL 2

96

23%

LEVEL 3

43

10%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

68
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

271

58%

LEVEL 2

128

27%

LEVEL 3

56

12%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

20

69%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

20

74%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.