JHS 50 JOHN D WELLS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

96

41%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

39

41%

LEVEL 2

33

34%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

22

29%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

57

42%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

31

32%

LEVEL 2

33

34%

LEVEL 3

21

22%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

24

46%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

14

41%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

68

39%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

37

28%

LEVEL 2

48

36%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

54

33%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

42

63%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

22

58%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

53
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

78

40%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

64
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

18

50%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

17

57%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

87

41%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

41

26%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

93

45%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

59
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

42

28%

LEVEL 2

49

33%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

18

64%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.