Skip to Content
Main content

PS 282 PARK SLOPE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

114

31%

LEVEL 2

109

30%

LEVEL 3

85

23%

LEVEL 4

61

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

58

24%

LEVEL 2

84

35%

LEVEL 3

41

17%

LEVEL 4

59

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

31

26%

LEVEL 2

41

34%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

30

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

57

32%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

27

22%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

29

24%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

16

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

12

57%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

79
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

72

32%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

31

34%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

21

23%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

17

26%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

87

27%

LEVEL 2

100

31%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

59

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

46

21%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

55

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

27

61%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

146
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

102

29%

LEVEL 2

107

30%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

61

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

97
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

55

23%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

59

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

12

86%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

37

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

34

33%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

40

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

80

38%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

44

32%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

132
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

105

31%

LEVEL 2

102

30%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

58

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

97
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

52

23%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

58

26%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

11

37%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.