Skip to Content
Main content

PS 150 CHARLES JAMES FOX GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

185

44%

LEVEL 2

116

28%

LEVEL 3

78

19%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

147

40%

LEVEL 2

92

25%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

101

50%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

69

42%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

84

39%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

78

38%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

47

58%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

32

42%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

95
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

137

42%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

61

19%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

99
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

113

40%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

114

36%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

94

34%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

71

69%

LEVEL 2

23

22%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

53

58%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

102
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

121

38%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

109
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

96

34%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

70

25%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

64

63%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

20
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

51

61%

LEVEL 2

13

15%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

176

44%

LEVEL 2

108

27%

LEVEL 3

74

19%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

141

41%

LEVEL 2

86

25%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

75
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

143

47%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

98
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

115

41%

LEVEL 2

69

24%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

42
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

42

37%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

32

37%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

21

24%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.