Skip to Content
Main content

PS 214 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 706

LEVEL 1

429

61%

LEVEL 2

153

22%

LEVEL 3

86

12%

LEVEL 4

38

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 755

LEVEL 1

402

53%

LEVEL 2

194

26%

LEVEL 3

100

13%

LEVEL 4

59

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

208

60%

LEVEL 2

77

22%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

186

51%

LEVEL 2

101

28%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

221

61%

LEVEL 2

76

21%

LEVEL 3

44

12%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

216

55%

LEVEL 2

93

24%

LEVEL 3

51

13%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

12

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

8

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

104

60%

LEVEL 2

32

19%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

46
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

100

52%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

310

63%

LEVEL 2

114

23%

LEVEL 3

49

10%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

96
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

282

55%

LEVEL 2

135

26%

LEVEL 3

62

12%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

319

55%

LEVEL 2

139

24%

LEVEL 3

83

14%

LEVEL 4

36

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

290

47%

LEVEL 2

173

28%

LEVEL 3

96

16%

LEVEL 4

55

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

110

85%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

112

79%

LEVEL 2

21

15%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

123
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 615

LEVEL 1

352

57%

LEVEL 2

140

23%

LEVEL 3

86

14%

LEVEL 4

37

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

154
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

318

49%

LEVEL 2

171

27%

LEVEL 3

95

15%

LEVEL 4

59

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

77

85%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

84

75%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

40

47%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

58

50%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

389

63%

LEVEL 2

130

21%

LEVEL 3

72

12%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

344

54%

LEVEL 2

169

26%

LEVEL 3

80

13%

LEVEL 4

46

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

116
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

358

59%

LEVEL 2

137

22%

LEVEL 3

80

13%

LEVEL 4

36

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

137
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

346

53%

LEVEL 2

164

25%

LEVEL 3

84

13%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

71

75%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

56

52%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.