Skip to Content
Main content

PS 57 CRESCENT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

108

52%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

136

54%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

59

56%

LEVEL 2

24

23%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

74

54%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

49

49%

LEVEL 2

26

26%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

62

54%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

23

47%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

29

52%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

80

54%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

101

58%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

81

46%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

113

51%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

27

90%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

23

82%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

79

46%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

51
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

95

47%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

29

83%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

41

87%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

102

55%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

129

56%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

42
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

79

49%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

105

51%

LEVEL 2

54

26%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

29

64%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

31

69%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.