Skip to Content
Main content

PS 134 GEORGE F BRISTOW GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

175

61%

LEVEL 2

64

22%

LEVEL 3

33

12%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

168

59%

LEVEL 2

68

24%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

68

53%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

67

53%

LEVEL 2

38

30%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

107

68%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

101

63%

LEVEL 2

30

19%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

77

65%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

74

61%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

94

59%

LEVEL 2

37

23%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

90

59%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

124

54%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

120

53%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

51

91%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

48

83%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

143

58%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

48
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

126

54%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

32

80%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

42

78%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

166

62%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

168

60%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

41
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

149

61%

LEVEL 2

55

22%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

141

57%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

26

65%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

27

69%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.