Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 144 MICHELANGELO GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

231

52%

LEVEL 2

111

25%

LEVEL 3

67

15%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

220

50%

LEVEL 2

101

23%

LEVEL 3

83

19%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

96

46%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

88

43%

LEVEL 2

53

26%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

135

57%

LEVEL 2

52

22%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

132

55%

LEVEL 2

48

20%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

6

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

14

67%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

61
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

148

53%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

135

50%

LEVEL 2

63

23%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

65

50%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

61

49%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

159

46%

LEVEL 2

93

27%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

152

43%

LEVEL 2

89

25%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

72

76%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

68

77%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

100
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

204

51%

LEVEL 2

98

24%

LEVEL 3

67

17%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

120
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

182

46%

LEVEL 2

96

24%

LEVEL 3

83

21%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

27

68%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

38

86%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

56

51%

LEVEL 2

23

21%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

42

41%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

175

53%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

49

15%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

178

52%

LEVEL 2

74

22%

LEVEL 3

55

16%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

94
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

192

50%

LEVEL 2

95

25%

LEVEL 3

63

17%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

112
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

180

47%

LEVEL 2

90

24%

LEVEL 3

78

20%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

39

64%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

40

67%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.