Skip to Content
Main content

PS 78 ANNE HUTCHINSON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

234

56%

LEVEL 2

84

20%

LEVEL 3

62

15%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

210

55%

LEVEL 2

81

21%

LEVEL 3

64

17%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

105

54%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

94

51%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

129

58%

LEVEL 2

42

19%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

116

58%

LEVEL 2

37

18%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

75
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

162

54%

LEVEL 2

62

21%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

69
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

148

54%

LEVEL 2

56

21%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

59

65%

LEVEL 2

16

18%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

49

57%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

178

53%

LEVEL 2

72

21%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

152

49%

LEVEL 2

71

23%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

56

73%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

58

78%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

96
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

209

54%

LEVEL 2

81

21%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

92
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

188

53%

LEVEL 2

77

22%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

25

83%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

22

81%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

36

50%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

31

44%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

198

58%

LEVEL 2

69

20%

LEVEL 3

51

15%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

179

57%

LEVEL 2

68

22%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

95
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

211

56%

LEVEL 2

74

19%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

88
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

187

53%

LEVEL 2

77

22%

LEVEL 3

59

17%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

23

64%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

23

72%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.