PS 279 CAPT MANUEL RIVERA JR GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 740

LEVEL 1

331

45%

LEVEL 2

218

29%

LEVEL 3

124

17%

LEVEL 4

67

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 720

LEVEL 1

269

37%

LEVEL 2

228

32%

LEVEL 3

145

20%

LEVEL 4

78

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

152

42%

LEVEL 2

119

33%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

126

38%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

179

47%

LEVEL 2

99

26%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

143

37%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

84

22%

LEVEL 4

40

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

8

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

10

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

55

44%

LEVEL 2

42

34%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

44

40%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

143
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

272

47%

LEVEL 2

165

28%

LEVEL 3

91

16%

LEVEL 4

52

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

171
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

218

38%

LEVEL 2

188

33%

LEVEL 3

115

20%

LEVEL 4

56

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

236

39%

LEVEL 2

189

31%

LEVEL 3

112

19%

LEVEL 4

64

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

187

32%

LEVEL 2

195

34%

LEVEL 3

127

22%

LEVEL 4

73

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

95

68%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

82

59%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

170
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

164

32%

LEVEL 2

173

34%

LEVEL 3

106

21%

LEVEL 4

64

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

201
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

156

30%

LEVEL 2

164

31%

LEVEL 3

127

24%

LEVEL 4

74

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

21
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

167

72%

LEVEL 2

45

19%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

22
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

113

57%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

12

38%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

11

37%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 708

LEVEL 1

319

45%

LEVEL 2

211

30%

LEVEL 3

118

17%

LEVEL 4

60

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

210
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

258

37%

LEVEL 2

222

32%

LEVEL 3

139

20%

LEVEL 4

71

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

140
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

225

44%

LEVEL 2

147

29%

LEVEL 3

88

17%

LEVEL 4

52

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

158
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

169

35%

LEVEL 2

158

33%

LEVEL 3

101

21%

LEVEL 4

57

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

51
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

106

46%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

65
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

100

43%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.