JHS 80 MOSHOLU PARKWAY (THE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

238

49%

LEVEL 2

147

30%

LEVEL 3

66

14%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

247

51%

LEVEL 2

123

25%

LEVEL 3

67

14%

LEVEL 4

48

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

99

48%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

122

55%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

139

50%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

125

48%

LEVEL 2

68

26%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

18

28%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

19

32%

LEVEL 2

21

35%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

12

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

30

53%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

33

49%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

184

55%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

184

56%

LEVEL 2

83

25%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

153

41%

LEVEL 2

129

34%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

153

42%

LEVEL 2

103

28%

LEVEL 3

63

17%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

85

78%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

94

78%

LEVEL 2

20

17%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

91
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

120

36%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

103
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

146

43%

LEVEL 2

93

27%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

118

79%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

101

71%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

14

33%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

23

43%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

224

51%

LEVEL 2

135

31%

LEVEL 3

54

12%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

224

52%

LEVEL 2

107

25%

LEVEL 3

58

13%

LEVEL 4

43

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

74
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

180

50%

LEVEL 2

108

30%

LEVEL 3

53

15%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

80
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

191

52%

LEVEL 2

97

26%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

58

48%

LEVEL 2

39

32%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

35
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

56

48%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.