Skip to Content
Main content

PS 85 GREAT EXPECTATIONS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

248

55%

LEVEL 2

122

27%

LEVEL 3

65

15%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

213

51%

LEVEL 2

105

25%

LEVEL 3

75

18%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

119

54%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

105

52%

LEVEL 2

53

26%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

129

57%

LEVEL 2

54

24%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

108

50%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

65

56%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

180

56%

LEVEL 2

85

26%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

162

52%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

157

47%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

143

45%

LEVEL 2

82

26%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

91

82%

LEVEL 2

13

12%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

70

69%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

155

50%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

91
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

122

43%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

93

67%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

91

68%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

233

55%

LEVEL 2

115

27%

LEVEL 3

62

15%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

204

50%

LEVEL 2

101

25%

LEVEL 3

73

18%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

64
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

201

55%

LEVEL 2

102

28%

LEVEL 3

53

14%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

175

50%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

61

17%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

47

59%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

38

58%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

14

21%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.