Skip to Content
Main content

PS 37 MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

178

43%

LEVEL 2

117

28%

LEVEL 3

81

20%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

146

40%

LEVEL 2

100

27%

LEVEL 3

79

22%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

81

40%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

66

36%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

97

46%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

80

43%

LEVEL 2

45

24%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

49

49%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

33

46%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

87
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

124

42%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

91
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

110

40%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

106

35%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

75

28%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

72

64%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

67

71%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

110
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

137

39%

LEVEL 2

103

29%

LEVEL 3

74

21%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

111
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

107

36%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

41

65%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

39

61%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

21

33%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

10

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

19

37%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

157

45%

LEVEL 2

99

28%

LEVEL 3

67

19%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

127

41%

LEVEL 2

87

28%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

94
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

145

44%

LEVEL 2

93

28%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

98
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

114

40%

LEVEL 2

72

25%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

24
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

33

41%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

32

40%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.