Skip to Content
Main content

PS 8 ISAAC VARIAN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

217

44%

LEVEL 2

148

30%

LEVEL 3

95

19%

LEVEL 4

36

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

203

44%

LEVEL 2

129

28%

LEVEL 3

78

17%

LEVEL 4

54

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

99

43%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

92

41%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

118

45%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

111

46%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

10

26%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

13

34%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

21

48%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

17

49%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

87
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

180

47%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

65

17%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

166

46%

LEVEL 2

107

30%

LEVEL 3

50

14%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

133

36%

LEVEL 2

118

32%

LEVEL 3

86

23%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

133

38%

LEVEL 2

95

27%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

84

67%

LEVEL 2

30

24%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

70

61%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

117
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

131

36%

LEVEL 2

112

31%

LEVEL 3

83

23%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

123
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

121

35%

LEVEL 2

100

29%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

86

63%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

82

68%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

22

34%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

21

40%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

195

45%

LEVEL 2

128

30%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

182

44%

LEVEL 2

118

29%

LEVEL 3

66

16%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

178

42%

LEVEL 2

131

31%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

164

42%

LEVEL 2

108

28%

LEVEL 3

65

17%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

39

54%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

39

51%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.