Skip to Content
Main content

PS 48 JOSEPH R DRAKE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

155

53%

LEVEL 2

82

28%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

151

48%

LEVEL 2

102

33%

LEVEL 3

40

13%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

80

52%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

65

43%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

75

54%

LEVEL 2

35

25%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

86

53%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

33

50%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

32

52%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

120

54%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

116

47%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

33

13%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

89

42%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

93

42%

LEVEL 2

78

35%

LEVEL 3

32

14%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

66

81%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

58

63%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

51
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

105

48%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

101

43%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

50

67%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

50

65%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

146

53%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

147

49%

LEVEL 2

98

32%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

42
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

115

54%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

108

48%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

40

49%

LEVEL 2

25

31%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

43

49%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.