EAST SIDE COMMUNITY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

66

30%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

86

35%

LEVEL 4

58

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

17

17%

LEVEL 2

40

39%

LEVEL 3

32

31%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

44

38%

LEVEL 4

25

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

25

22%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

41

36%

LEVEL 4

23

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

33

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

12

41%

LEVEL 4

11

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

18

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

21

47%

LEVEL 4

16

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

24

49%

LEVEL 4

19

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

29

26%

LEVEL 2

45

40%

LEVEL 3

31

27%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

64

37%

LEVEL 4

35

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

81

41%

LEVEL 4

53

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

21

49%

LEVEL 2

12

28%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

26

58%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

37

40%

LEVEL 4

27

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

17

18%

LEVEL 3

37

40%

LEVEL 4

33

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

34

27%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

36

29%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

25

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

105
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

37

18%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

70

34%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

133
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

79

36%

LEVEL 4

54

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.