Skip to Content
Main content

PS 153 ADAM CLAYTON POWELL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

102

39%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

103

41%

LEVEL 2

40

16%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

46

34%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

36

27%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

45

36%

LEVEL 2

22

18%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

28

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

56

43%

LEVEL 2

25

19%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

58

45%

LEVEL 2

18

14%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

35

27%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

11

24%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

13

29%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

17

37%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

90

45%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

73
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

85

45%

LEVEL 2

29

16%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

43

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

81

35%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

75

35%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

62

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

21

70%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

28

76%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

82
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

57

31%

LEVEL 2

47

25%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

48

29%

LEVEL 2

24

14%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

57

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

45

58%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

55

64%

LEVEL 2

16

19%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

11

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

100

41%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

97

42%

LEVEL 2

37

16%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

52

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

83
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

78

37%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

91
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

78

39%

LEVEL 2

29

15%

LEVEL 3

35

18%

LEVEL 4

56

28%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

24

48%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

25

46%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.