Skip to Content
Main content

MOTT HALL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

32

12%

LEVEL 3

76

27%

LEVEL 4

152

55%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

253
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

21

7%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

194

67%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

17

10%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

98

58%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

12

8%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

104

70%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

28

26%

LEVEL 4

54

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

9

6%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

90

63%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

8

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

13

72%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

12

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

10

45%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

190
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

27

12%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

122

53%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

207
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

161

68%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

25

10%

LEVEL 3

69

28%

LEVEL 4

150

61%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

13

5%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

187

73%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

16

47%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

227
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

31

12%

LEVEL 3

76

28%

LEVEL 4

151

56%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

252
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

20

7%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

193

68%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

16

30%

LEVEL 4

30

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

48

75%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

26

12%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

122

54%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

146

64%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

215
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

30

12%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

142

55%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

235
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

21

8%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

182

67%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

10

59%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

12

60%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.