JHS 143 ELEANOR ROOSEVELT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

149

59%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

127

53%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

52

54%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

47

45%

LEVEL 2

34

32%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

97

63%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

80

60%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

137

60%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

115

53%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

98

51%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

75

42%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

51

85%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

52

85%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

33
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

37

36%

LEVEL 2

34

33%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

34
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

32

32%

LEVEL 2

34

34%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

112

76%

LEVEL 2

30

20%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

95

68%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

19

63%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

12

50%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

130

59%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

115

53%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

30
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

125

59%

LEVEL 2

56

27%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

107

52%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

24

60%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

20

61%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.