AMBER CHARTER SCHOOL EAST HARLEM GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

47

23%

LEVEL 3

73

36%

LEVEL 4

57

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

66

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

22

20%

LEVEL 3

38

35%

LEVEL 4

32

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

19

17%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

27

24%

LEVEL 4

41

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

25

26%

LEVEL 3

35

37%

LEVEL 4

25

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

30

31%

LEVEL 4

25

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

14

21%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

16

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

94
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

30

22%

LEVEL 3

55

40%

LEVEL 4

39

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

31

23%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

46

34%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

32

19%

LEVEL 3

67

40%

LEVEL 4

52

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

62

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

15

44%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

14

34%

LEVEL 2

17

41%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

16

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

16

37%

LEVEL 4

15

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

40

24%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

41

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

51

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

122
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

68

36%

LEVEL 4

54

29%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.