Skip to Content
Main content

PS 333 MANHATTAN SCHOOL-CHILDREN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

81

22%

LEVEL 3

132

35%

LEVEL 4

113

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

68

18%

LEVEL 3

123

33%

LEVEL 4

143

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

62

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

139
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

34

18%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

79

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

31

17%

LEVEL 3

76

42%

LEVEL 4

51

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

63

35%

LEVEL 4

64

36%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

13

57%

LEVEL 4

10

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

13

68%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

47

20%

LEVEL 3

91

38%

LEVEL 4

88

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

35

15%

LEVEL 3

80

35%

LEVEL 4

108

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

15

35%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

12

28%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

18

36%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

14

28%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

17

33%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

10

20%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

70

22%

LEVEL 3

108

34%

LEVEL 4

111

35%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

52

17%

LEVEL 3

101

32%

LEVEL 4

134

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

17

31%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

24

44%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

11

19%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

22

38%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

241
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

80

22%

LEVEL 3

130

36%

LEVEL 4

111

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

69

21%

LEVEL 3

117

36%

LEVEL 4

110

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

241
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

49

16%

LEVEL 3

108

35%

LEVEL 4

133

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

16

35%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

15

25%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.