Skip to Content
Main content

PS 84 LILLIAN WEBER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

82

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

53

21%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

100

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

39

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

20

16%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

47

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

32

27%

LEVEL 4

43

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

53

41%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

8

80%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

7

64%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

35

33%

LEVEL 4

54

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

70

62%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

14

58%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

29

30%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

29

30%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

24

25%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

21

22%

LEVEL 4

18

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

80

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

98

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

27

73%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

24

65%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

139
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

43

19%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

75

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

148
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

48

21%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

93

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

7

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

18

13%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

67

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

20

14%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

83

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

47

40%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

38

34%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

146
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

43

19%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

80

35%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

155
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

50

20%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

99

40%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.