Skip to Content
Main content

EAST SIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

421
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

14

3%

LEVEL 3

54

12%

LEVEL 4

367

84%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

9

3%

LEVEL 3

23

8%

LEVEL 4

260

88%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

231
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

9

4%

LEVEL 3

28

12%

LEVEL 4

203

84%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

4

2%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

159

88%

MALE

PROFICIENT

190
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

5

3%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

164

83%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

101

89%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

27

93%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

20

91%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

54
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

50

91%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

43

93%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

292
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

9

3%

LEVEL 3

40

13%

LEVEL 4

252

83%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

184
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

2%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

170

90%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

10

77%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

5

83%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

24

71%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

22

69%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

374
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

1%

LEVEL 3

35

9%

LEVEL 4

339

89%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

243

96%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

47
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

19

32%

LEVEL 4

28

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

17

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

382
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

9

2%

LEVEL 3

43

11%

LEVEL 4

339

86%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

244
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

2%

LEVEL 3

20

8%

LEVEL 4

224

90%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

28

62%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

36

82%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.