Skip to Content
Main content

PS 41 GREENWICH VILLAGE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

27

9%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

191

61%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

28

9%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

190

61%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

19

11%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

104

58%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

147
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

14

8%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

99

59%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

8

6%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

87

64%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

91

62%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

30
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

21

64%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

39
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

30

68%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

14

82%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

191
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

136

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

187
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

20

9%

LEVEL 3

62

29%

LEVEL 4

125

58%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

13

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

19

58%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

12

5%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

176

70%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

12

5%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

173

68%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

11

18%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

20

33%

LEVEL 4

15

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

34
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

9

15%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

17

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

271
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

25

8%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

188

61%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

252
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

22

8%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

179

63%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

255
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

25

9%

LEVEL 3

79

27%

LEVEL 4

176

61%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

12

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

14

54%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.