Skip to Content
Main content

PS 33 CHELSEA PREP GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

76

26%

LEVEL 2

29

10%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

146

49%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

65

23%

LEVEL 2

37

13%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

143

50%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

41

25%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

79

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

74

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

35

26%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

67

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

33

24%

LEVEL 2

16

12%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

69

51%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

63
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

57

86%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

59
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

56

90%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

59

81%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

51

80%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

27

54%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

27

55%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

44

49%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

33

38%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

24

28%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

48

19%

LEVEL 2

23

9%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

141

55%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

30

13%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

138

58%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

28

65%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

29

60%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

191
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

28

10%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

146

51%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

183
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

58

21%

LEVEL 2

33

12%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

143

52%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

3

2%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

127

80%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

116

79%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

70

50%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

61

44%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

27

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

183
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

53

21%

LEVEL 2

21

8%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

143

56%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

176
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

141

57%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

23

56%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

21

55%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.