PS 2 MEYER LONDON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

42

16%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

106

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

103

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

36

30%

LEVEL 4

54

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

17

15%

LEVEL 3

36

33%

LEVEL 4

47

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

18

13%

LEVEL 3

46

33%

LEVEL 4

52

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

56

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

177
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

30

13%

LEVEL 3

75

33%

LEVEL 4

102

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

153
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

21

11%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

99

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

30

14%

LEVEL 3

71

34%

LEVEL 4

100

48%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

23

12%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

101

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

21

42%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

16

44%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

161
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

28

13%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

98

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

142
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

21

12%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

96

55%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

27
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

10

20%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

19

37%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

23
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

16

31%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

39

16%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

102

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

96

45%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

141
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

36

18%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

81

40%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

134
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

28

15%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

81

44%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

47
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

22

39%

LEVEL 4

25

44%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

22

52%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.