PS 140 NATHAN STRAUS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

119

54%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

120

55%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

30

14%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

59

52%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

69

58%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

60

56%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

51

50%

LEVEL 2

28

28%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

21

64%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

96

54%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

93

55%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

68

41%

LEVEL 2

57

35%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

70

45%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

51

89%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

50

79%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

98

49%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

43
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

100

51%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

21

91%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

20

87%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

14

39%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

108

55%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

106

58%

LEVEL 2

47

26%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

35
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

97

52%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

99

54%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

21

58%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.