CHARLES CAMPAGNE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

16

13%

LEVEL 3

50

41%

LEVEL 4

49

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

43

32%

LEVEL 4

58

44%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

26

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

20

33%

LEVEL 4

28

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

28

44%

LEVEL 4

23

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

23

32%

LEVEL 4

30

42%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

12

39%

LEVEL 4

13

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

15

36%

LEVEL 4

22

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

57
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

27

42%

LEVEL 4

30

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

19

32%

LEVEL 4

25

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

11

50%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

7

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

49

42%

LEVEL 4

49

42%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

19

15%

LEVEL 3

43

35%

LEVEL 4

57

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

99
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

50

42%

LEVEL 4

49

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

38

39%

LEVEL 4

45

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

16

15%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

52

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

12

48%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.