LAKEVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

421
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

35

7%

LEVEL 3

89

19%

LEVEL 4

332

70%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

447
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

11

2%

LEVEL 2

29

6%

LEVEL 3

73

15%

LEVEL 4

374

77%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

208
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

19

8%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

166

71%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

222
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

20

8%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

180

73%

MALE

PROFICIENT

213
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

166

70%

MALE

PROFICIENT

225
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

9

4%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

194

80%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

12

67%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

15

71%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

304
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

17

5%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

259

80%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

331
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

11

3%

LEVEL 3

45

13%

LEVEL 4

286

83%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

51

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

57

67%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

14

40%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

14

47%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

396
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

18

4%

LEVEL 3

76

18%

LEVEL 4

320

77%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

420
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

15

3%

LEVEL 3

59

13%

LEVEL 4

361

82%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

15

26%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

12

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

8

16%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

401
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

14

3%

LEVEL 2

32

7%

LEVEL 3

80

18%

LEVEL 4

321

72%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

437
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

10

2%

LEVEL 2

25

5%

LEVEL 3

69

15%

LEVEL 4

368

78%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

20
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

11

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

372
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

26

6%

LEVEL 3

67

17%

LEVEL 4

305

75%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

383
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

24

6%

LEVEL 3

57

14%

LEVEL 4

326

79%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

10

15%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

22

32%

LEVEL 4

27

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

16

22%

LEVEL 4

48

66%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.