GUGGENHEIM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

83

40%

LEVEL 4

61

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

39

18%

LEVEL 3

87

41%

LEVEL 4

69

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

31

34%

LEVEL 4

24

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

44

46%

LEVEL 4

24

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

20

17%

LEVEL 3

52

45%

LEVEL 4

37

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

20

17%

LEVEL 3

43

36%

LEVEL 4

45

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

13

43%

LEVEL 4

15

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

13

36%

LEVEL 4

14

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

32

23%

LEVEL 3

61

45%

LEVEL 4

41

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

60

44%

LEVEL 4

50

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

11

33%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

10

31%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

79

41%

LEVEL 4

59

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

83

42%

LEVEL 4

67

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

138
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

46

24%

LEVEL 3

79

41%

LEVEL 4

59

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

151
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

36

18%

LEVEL 3

82

41%

LEVEL 4

69

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

71

42%

LEVEL 4

58

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

31

17%

LEVEL 3

78

43%

LEVEL 4

65

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.